Hah! Perhaps there was some use in having the class be named. However, I'm not

sure what this is really testing. If the CRUD test with CustomType works, then
transforming field marshallers work, so why do we need to make sure they have a
specific class name?

src/test/java/com/samskivert/depot/TransformTest.java

@@ -193,8 +193,7 @@ public class TransformTest extends TestBase
         assertTrue(FieldMarshaller.createMarshaller(field) != null);
 
         field = TransformRecord.class.getField("custom");
-        assertTrue(FieldMarshaller.createMarshaller(field).getClass().
-                   getName().endsWith("FieldMarshaller$TransformingMarshaller"));
+        assertTrue(FieldMarshaller.createMarshaller(field) != null);
     }
 
 //    @Test public void testInvalidFieldAnnotation ()